The Evangelical Genius of John Peter Lange

The Evangelical Genius of J... by perixmind


FREE ONLINE:






Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Esplana Bible Formula and Kelsey Eccentric Existence

 THE ECCENTRIC FORMULA: ESPLANA BIBLE FORMULA AND KELSEY ECCENTRIC EXISTENCE The Integral Connection of "The Bible Formula" by Periander A. Esplana and "Eccentric Existence" by David H. Kelsey Central Idea: “Eccentric” Formula Human life does not have its center within itself. The center lies outside us: in God’s relation to us. Therefore, we understand what a human is only by understanding how the triune God relates to us. Three Divine Relations That Define Humanity Esplana and Kelsey structure their entire system around three ways God relates to human creatures : 1. Created by God the Father through the Word (Genesis 1:1) Humans are finite, contingent creatures. Our existence is shaped by embodiment, time, limits, and dependence. This relation answers “What are we as creatures?” 2. Reconciled by the Trinity (1 John 5:7) God draws humans into healed relationship through Jesus Christ. This ...
Read more

THE TRINITY

Premise: The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are distinct persons. Premise: The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are united in one Godhead. Inference: Therefore, the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are distinct persons united in one Godhead. W e can use the predicates F(x) to represent the Father, S(x) to represent the Son, and HS(x) to represent the Holy Spirit. We can then use logical connectives and quantifiers to express the relationships between these predicates. One way to express the idea that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are distinct persons within one Godhead is to use the following formula: ∀ x(F(x)  ∧  S(x)  ∧  HS(x)) This formula states that for all x, x is both the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit. To express the idea that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are one God, we can use the following formula: ∀ x(F(x) → S(x)  ∧  HS(x))  ∧   ∀ x(S(x) → F(x)  ∧  HS(x))  ∧   ∀ x(HS(x) → F(x)  ∧  S(x)) This formula s...
Read more